I could only analyze 4 of the bugs I reported because svdb is not accessible now. Viewing Bugs (1 - 5 / 5) [ <http://www.eda.org/svdb/print_all_bug_page.php> Print Reports ] [ <http://www.eda.org/svdb/csv_export.php> CSV Export ] <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=priority&dir=DESC&type=2> P <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=id&dir=DESC&type=2> ID # <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=category&dir=DESC&type=2> Category <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=severity&dir=DESC&type=2> Severity <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=status&dir=DESC&type=2> Status <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=last_updated&dir=ASC&type=2> Updated <http://www.eda.org/svdb/images/down.gif> <http://www.eda.org/svdb/view_all_set.php?sort=summary&dir=DESC&type=2> Summary <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_page.php?bug_id=0001241> Update Bug <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001241> 0001241 SV-BC major new 04-03-06 5.2: Are predefined integer types allowed as packed arrays elements <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_page.php?bug_id=0001316> Update Bug <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001316> 0001316 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001316&nbn=1#bugnotes> 1 SV-BC feature assigned (shalom) 02-05-06 tagged union example section 4.11 is incorrect <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_page.php?bug_id=0000672> Update Bug <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000672> 0000672 SV-BC major new 04-15-05 %m needs to be updated for SV scopes <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_page.php?bug_id=0000516> Update Bug <http://www.eda.org/svdb/images/priority_3.gif> <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000516> 0000516 SV-BC major new 04-13-05 5.7 and 5.8 description of type compatible arrays <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_update_page.php?bug_id=0000507> Update Bug <http://www.eda.org/svdb/images/priority_3.gif> <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000507> 0000507 <http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000507&nbn=1#bugnotes> 1 SV-BC trivial new 04-13-05 typo in section 22.2 1241: easy errata, has proposed LRM chanegs by Brad 1316: simple fix for example in tagegd unions (duplicate of 941) 672: clarification needed for incomplete specification for %m 516: P1800 has a partial fix for this issue Section 5.7 is correct but section 5.8 needs to be reworked.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 06 2006 - 13:54:13 PDT