>The change allowed all integral types in packed unions. Do we then want >to allow all integral types in packed arrays, including bytes? Sounds >good to me, but do we need to exclude 'integer' for backward >compatibility with de facto Verilog? It sounds reasonable to me also. As far as I know, the only reason that integer types were not allowed is the one you list: that legacy designs might be relying on tools that ignored the illegal ranges in integer [high:low] i; I presume that 'time' would also need to be excluded for the same reason. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Apr 11 11:40:42 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 11 2006 - 11:40:46 PDT