>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> >I have the complete opposite opinion. I would rather not see anyone use >an atomic type other than bit, reg, or logic in a packed struct, union >or array. We're trying to get people to think of these predefined types >not in terms individual bits, but as a more abstract value. But the integer types are already allowed in packed structs and unions. Regardless of your opinion on whether they should be allowed inside packed types, the language should be consistent. Either they should be allowed in all or in none. It makes no sense to allow them in some but not others, unless there are problems particular to some but not others. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Apr 11 12:19:53 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 11 2006 - 12:20:27 PDT