[sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] No event triggers in functions?

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 26 2006 - 16:57:05 PDT
>Then why not just remove the distinctions between tasks and functions
>and be done with it?

If you did that, you would have to add the concept of a "no delay"
function back in some other way.  There are places where functions
with delays could not be allowed without causing serious problems
for simulation.

Relaxing the restrictions on side-effects is less of a problem.  I
don't know how valuable their protection is to designers.  If they
are seen as too valuable to give up, I suppose one compromise would
be to remove the restrictions only on class method functions.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Wed Apr 26 16:57:11 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 26 2006 - 16:57:16 PDT