RE: [sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] No event triggers in functions?

I don't know about 'context', but as for 'pure', it might be better to
have 'pure' be a default, as you would have to write 'impure' if you
wanted to write risky or non-synthesizable code.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:32 AM
> To: sv-ec@server.eda.org; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] No event triggers in functions?
> 
> Another possibility would be to enhance function and task declarations
> with the 'context' and 'pure' keywords of 26.4.2 and 26.4.3.
> 
> >Relaxing the restrictions on side-effects is less of a problem.  I
> >don't know how valuable their protection is to designers.  If they
> >are seen as too valuable to give up, I suppose one compromise would
> >be to remove the restrictions only on class method functions.
> 
> -- Brad