RE: [sv-bc] Mailbox - null return

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Thu May 04 2006 - 15:28:53 PDT
>Makes sense. So the standard added a capability that is not likely to 
>occur with a compliant simulator but a separate tool could impose a 
>limit and monitor it through failure to create a mailbox. Interesting 
>and forward thinking.

I don't see any reason why this should be handled differently for
mailboxes than for any other dynamically allocated type.  They should
be consistent.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Thu May 4 15:28:57 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 04 2006 - 15:29:18 PDT