RE: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Issues on anonymous program items

My bad. Brad is correct - thanks for the correction.

Anonymous programs are indeed allowed in packages. That would make
Surya's original example correct.

	Arturo

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad
Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:45 AM
To: spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com; sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Issues on anonymous program items

This was P1800 ballot issue 7.

   http://eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=344

-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Steven Sharp
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:35 AM
To: spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com; sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org;
Arturo.Salz@synopsys.COM
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Issues on anonymous program items


>From: "Arturo Salz" <Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com>

>As written, your example is illegal. Currently, packages cannot include
>programs.

This is incorrect.  From 16.6:

"Anonymous programs can be used inside packages or compilation unit
scopes..."

And from A.1.10:

"package_item ::= ...
	| anonymous_program
	..."

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com