Does someone have to import the package or refer to an item in a packed for the final block to execute? I would think so; otherwise it would be difficult to manage the exclusion of packages that you did not want to execute. Independently of whether final blocks in packages are a "good idea", I don't think it is a priority worth discussing right now. Dave ________________________________ From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:29 PM To: sv-bc@server.eda.org Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Final blocks in packages Following up on http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/4421.html , does any extra text need to be added to explain how final blocks in packages execute? In my opinion, no. I think it would be sufficient for a proposal only to add final blocks to the 19.2 list of items that can be shared via packages and in the BNF to move "final_construct" out of its current locations and into "package_or_generate_item_declaration". Independently of whether final blocks in packages is a "good idea", does the above seem like a sufficient way to modify the LRM if it were? -- BradReceived on Tue May 9 18:40:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 09 2006 - 18:40:15 PDT