Brad Pierce wrote: >>Certainly for things such as unpacked structs > > > Regarding structs and unions, unpacked vs. packed does not matter here, > because two packed struct types do not match unless they were declared > with the same declaration statement. (See 6.9.1.c.) And the difference > between types that don't match is always observable (if one wishes) via > generate and the type operator. (See 6.10.) I didn't intend to be exhaustive, I just wanted to point out that using the term "different" is dangerous since in *some* cases "different" types (i.e. includes into compilation units) are not observably different. Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.comReceived on Wed May 10 10:52:26 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 10 2006 - 10:52:31 PDT