In 19.7 (and Syntax 19-3) IEEE Std 1800-2005 says that a 1995-style list of ports can be used in an extern module declaration. It also says, "An extern module declaration shall match the actual module declaration's port and parameter lists in correspondence of names, positions, and their equivalent types." But if a 1995-style list of ports is used in the extern module declarations, then that declaration contains no information about port types. So how could they be equivalent (or not) to some other types? Also, an inconvenience is that if such an extern module declaration is used with the implicit .* port connections of 19.11.4, in which the port declarations on each side of such a connection must have equivalent types, then a tool must wait to do that error checking until some actual module has been linked in. This is only very weak support for separate compilation. -- BradReceived on Wed May 10 23:39:14 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 10 2006 - 23:39:25 PDT