I disagree here. I'll post my reasons on the sv-ec since this discussion belongs there. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On > Behalf Of Steven Sharp > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 7:48 PM > To: sv-bc@server.eda.org; srakshit@cal.interrasystems.com > Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Issues on Queue Operators > > > >From: Sharmistha Rakshit <srakshit@cal.interrasystems.com> > > >1. Here it has been stated > > "The empty array literal {} is used to denote an empty queue." > >my query :: Should this empty array literal syntax not be treated as an > >assignment pattern and > > be preceded by an apostrophe( ' ) ? > > Yes, I believe so. > > >2. > >Further , for the example given in section 5.14.1 to explain Queue > >Operators ( which are not applicable to normal arrays ) > > q ={q,6} ; > > q = {e,q}; > > q = { q[0:pos-1], e, q[pos,$] }; > > q = { q[0:pos], e, q[pos+1,$] }; > > > >Now, we can't have a unsized constant as a member of concat expression . > >should the RHS be treated as concatenation or assignment pattern ? > > Since it is also illegal to use concatenation on anything but integral > types, these clearly need to be changed to be assignment patterns. > However, even then they do not appear to be legal. They seem to assume > that a queue will be flattened into a list of its elements when used > inside an assignment pattern. > > >3.Is the following case valid ? > > > >module T; > > int b[4:0]; > > int c; > > int a[4:0] = '{b[3:0],c} ; > >endmodule > > This appears to be the same issue I filed in Mantis item 801. It is > my understanding that this is not valid. The RHS is not an assignment > pattern containing 5 elements that can be assigned to ints. Instead, > it is an assignment pattern containing 2 elements. The first element > is an array of 4 ints, and the second is a single int. The first element > cannot legally be assigned to an int, so this is illegal. > > Steven Sharp > sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue May 30 07:59:29 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 30 2006 - 07:59:37 PDT