[sv-bc] Re: Discussion overview of SV name resolution

-----Non-member submission-----
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:55:31 -0700
From: "Ryan, Ray" <Ray_Ryan@mentor.com>

 Gord,

Are function calls allowed in a dotted name ?

For example (from mantis #1391) in 13.13.2 the example contains:

	process::self.srandom(100);

where 'self' is a function that returns a class handle.

- Ray


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Vreugdenhil, Gordon
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: SV_EC List; SV_BC List
> Subject: [sv-ec] Discussion overview of SV name resolution
> 
> At the last SV-BC meeting, I committed to sending out a 
> preliminary version of a document outlining my thoughts on a 
> framework for SV name resolution.  Attached is an html 
> version of that document.  This is not intended to be an LRM 
> proposal (yet) though at some point the issues and 
> clarifications raised in the document need to become part of 
> a combined 1364/1800 spec.  Ideally, I would like to see this 
> become the basis for a more systematic approach for reaching 
> consensus on name resolution issues.  Feedback is definitely welcome.
> 
> This is also attached to Mantis 1043 as it is directly related.
> See:
>     http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001043
> for the attachment "name_resolution.htm"
> 
> Gord.
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
> Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com
> 
>