RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Discussion overview of SV name resolution

In the interests of clarity and readability, I would like
to confirm that I agree with what Paul wrote here.

Doug 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Graham [mailto:pgraham@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:36 AM
> To: Warmke, Doug
> Cc: sharp@cadence.com; Vreugdenhil, Gordon; 
> sv-ec@verilog.org; sv-bc@verilog.org; Ryan, Ray
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Discussion overview of SV 
> name resolution
> 
> > I am not a fan of the "Uniform Access Principle".
> 
> I _am_ a fan of the uniform access principle.  I believe
> that access should be uniform.  So I think that access
> through a function should uniformly require parentheses.
> What I don't like is making exceptions to the uniform
> access principle for special cases, like the case of a 
> function or method called with no arguments.
> 
> Paul
>