RE: [sv-bc] Defparam -- mixed message from IEEE standards

From: Clifford E. Cummings <cliffc_at_.....>
Date: Wed Jun 14 2006 - 05:51:38 PDT
Shalom -

If we add downward named parameter passing, would this satisfy your 
defparam needs?

Regards - Cliff

At 02:35 AM 6/14/2006, Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
>I quote Cliff: "defparam was a good idea".
>
>Almost any useful construct can be misused.
>
>I searched through 1364-2005 and 1800-2005. The word "useful" is used 19
>times in 1364-2005 and 28 times in 1800-2005.
>
>Does anyone want to propose disallowing upwards defparams ?
>
>Shalom

----------------------------------------------------
Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com
Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification Training
Received on Wed Jun 14 05:51:13 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 14 2006 - 05:51:38 PDT