But if it exists, it should be done The Right Way, according to what users need and want. Even more so if there are situations where there is not another option. And Chris Spear tells me that users fall on this time and again. > Note that you do have a way to work around the problem in many > situations: > stop using these methods and write a foreach loop to perform the sum > yourself, using an accumulator of whatever size you want. I am not fond > of the idea of having built-in methods for things that are trivial to > write > for yourself. Apparently these methods were added primarily for use in > constraints, where that is not an option. ShalomReceived on Fri Jun 30 00:11:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 00:11:17 PDT