>From: "Rishiyur Nikhil" <nikhil@bluespec.com> >'&&&' is not merely a conjunction operator, and its reason for >existence is not to introduce short-circuiting-- it is because it has >a variable-binding function unique to the pattern-matching facilities >of the language. Thanks for the explanation. It sounds like '&&&' is not appropriate to use as a general-purpose short-circuit logical AND. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Mon Aug 14 14:42:57 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 14 2006 - 14:43:07 PDT