RE: FW: [sv-bc] [Fwd: Issues with IEEE 1364-2005]

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Aug 15 2006 - 11:56:26 PDT

and come to wrong conclusions...

> >Why should it matter to a user what the original "purpose" of an
> >operator was?
> 
> It helps one reason about backward compatibility.

Received on Tue Aug 15 11:56:57 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-bc] Proposal for Mantis 1119: 19.3: Preprocessor macros within strings"
Previous message: Michael \(Mac\) McNamara: "RE: FW: [sv-bc] [Fwd: Issues with IEEE 1364-2005]"
Maybe in reply to: Brad Pierce: "FW: [sv-bc] [Fwd: Issues with IEEE 1364-2005]"
Next in thread: Steven Sharp: "RE: [sv-bc] [Fwd: Issues with IEEE 1364-2005]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 15 2006 - 11:57:02 PDT