Re: [sv-bc] Is "var" required for real ports?

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Fri Sep 15 2006 - 10:20:55 PDT
There are only two contexts where 'var' is required, as described in --

    Footnote A.14.

    6.10

Neither of these correspond to 'var real'.

-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Stuart Sutherland
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:39 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Is "var" required for real ports?



I has been brought to my attention that one SV simulator requires a
"real"
module port to be declared as "var real", and other simulator as just
"real".  I cannot find any justification in the LRM for "var" being
required to declare a real port.  This difference in simulators is
third-hand...I don't have the product licenses to test the claim.

If "var" is required, can anyone point me to exactly where that is
specified in the LRM?

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
 
Received on Fri Sep 15 10:21:10 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 15 2006 - 10:21:20 PDT