>From: "Logie Ramachandran" <Logie.Ramachandran@synopsys.com> >It may be possible to obtain the intended behavior of local >using the export construct itself. This is basically what I was suggesting in my email that started this thread. It seemed more symmetric to use the export syntax to control external visibility of both symbols declared in the package and ones imported there. It isn't a strong argument, since there is already asymmetry in the syntax for declaring the symbols versus importing them. Since everyone else seems to be happier with using 'local' for symbols declared in the package, I am willing to go along. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Thu Sep 21 16:31:31 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 21 2006 - 16:31:38 PDT