[sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] static variable initializers

Shalom,

It hasn't been voted on because there is no proposal for it yet. And you
won't know who supports it until then (or unless a straw poll it taken).

My comment about Peter Flake's action item was long before we had a
mantis system.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:28 AM
> To: Rich, Dave; sv-bc@server.eda.org; sv-ec@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] static variable initializers
> 
> Note that this request was not voted on the SV-BC, and not all members
> necessarily support it. It was filed in Mantis because some support
it.
> 
> There is a bugnote in 1556 which points to the SV-EC mails and
documents
> which deleted it.
> 
> Shalom
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Rich, Dave
> > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 7:23 AM
> > To: Steven Sharp; sv-bc@server.eda.org; sv-ec@server.eda.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-ec] static variable initializers
> >
> > The request to add back the required use of the static keyword in
> > certain cases is mantis 1556. I believe Peter Flake had an action
item
> > to address this issue after SV3.0, but he never got around to it
> before
> > he retired, so the sentence got dropped. (I hear it was a short
lived
> > retirement :)
> >
> >
> > http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001556