Well, IP encryption is already in Verilog. That was apparently the basis for the VHDL version. PSL assertions could have been added to SV, but another route was taken for adding assertions, so it wouldn't make much sense now. Packages don't need to be part of the language. I think SV has the mechanisms Kurt Baty would need to write fixed- and floating-point packages if desired. The "process(all)" construct sounds like always @* or always_comb. Hierarchical signal references for testbenches are clearly borrowed from Verilog. Unary reduction operators presumably are also. Most of the extensions seem to be borrowed from Verilog or SV, so we are already covered. We don't have parameterized packages in SV, but parameterized classes may provide most of the desired functionality. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Oct 10 11:51:23 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 10 2006 - 11:51:39 PDT