Intel made at least three reasonable, still unresolved, SV-BC enhancement requests during the P1800 balloting http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000696 http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000693 http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000694 And, as described in http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ac/hm/2508.html , there are now many additional, reasonable ideas for enhancing the language from Intel in the Attached File of http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001530 -- Brad -----Original Message----- From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:28 PM To: sv-bc@eda.org; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.COM Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Mantis 1571: Add default values for macro arguments >From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com> >Maybe weaknesses of the core SV language are abusing the users, so they >are attempting to work around those weaknesses with macros. If so, >then we should strengthen the core SV language, not the macro language. Which was Dave's point. There are other possibilities. They may be working around limitations of a particular partial implementation of SV. So the question for Shalom is, what are these complex macro mechanisms being used for? Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Thu Oct 19 13:54:36 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 19 2006 - 13:54:42 PDT