RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1571: Add default values for macro arguments

I really think vendors should not decide for users what is good for
them...

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:59 PM
> To: Rich, Dave; Steven Sharp; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1571: Add default values for macro
arguments
> 
> Hardly so.
> 
> Shalom
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Rich, Dave
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:52 PM
> > To: Bresticker, Shalom; Steven Sharp; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1571: Add default values for macro
> arguments
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> > > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:36 AM
> > > To: Steven Sharp; sv-bc@server.eda.org
> > > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1571: Add default values for macro
> > arguments
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > There are other possibilities.  They may be working around
> > limitations
> > > > of a particular partial implementation of SV.
> > >
> > > [SB] That is not the case.
> > >
> > > > So the question for Shalom is, what are these complex macro
> > mechanisms
> > > > being used for?
> > >
> > > [SB] One example is wrappers around different types of assertions,
> > such
> > > as SVA or OVL.
> > [DR>] Our original point. Q.E.D.
> > >
> > > Another example is to inline code which performs complex register
> > > instantiations.
> > [DR>] Ditto
> > >
> > > Shalom