RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Proposed merged LRM Table of Contents

I also think that SDF Annotation (29) should immediately follow Timing
Checks (15).

I think that sections of Hierarchy (21) and Generates (22) should follow
(immediately or almost so) the detailed description of Modules.

Thanks,
Shalom

> I don't think Clause 3, which is the first with real content, should
> already start with detailed descriptions of modules, packages,
programs,
> and interfaces, before the more basic subjects, starting with but not
> ending with, lexical conventions and data types, for example, have
been
> described. The detailed descriptions of modules, etc., are not
> understandable without understanding first the pieces of which they
are
> made. Besides, it is of enormous size. It does make sense to devote a
> separate clause to each of them. (I would favor giving packages their
> own separate clause as well.)
> 
> I can see putting overview descriptions of them, with only a little
> detail, at the beginning, with detailed descriptions later on.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.