I understand. But those vendors who have implemented a transaction recording scheme have a way of handling that, don't they? Shalom > And, BTW, dumping automatics is not so much a lifetime issue as a naming > problem. It would not be difficult to arrange for the simulator to dump > automatics every time an automatic task or function is called. But, when > the same function is called more than once in the same time slot (or > recursively), the names used in the dump must be unique, simple, and > meaningful to designers. Finding such a naming scheme is a challenge. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Mar 3 23:14:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 03 2007 - 23:14:26 PST