I agree. Substr() provides the option to take a slice of a non-constant width, but that doesn't mean that SV couldn't define a part select on string in addition to substr(). --Yulik. -----Original Message----- From: Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 5:10 PM To: Feldman, Yulik Cc: 'sv-bc@server.eda-stds.org' Subject: RE: [sv-bc] part selects on arbitrary expressions You are correct that slices of strings are not defined, but I see no reason why one should not be able to do so instead of having to use the substr() method. Shalom > Anyway, I don't think the two definitions interfere with each other, > at least because there is no such thing as a part select of a string > (only a "bit" ("character") select). -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Mar 14 08:31:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 14 2007 - 08:31:44 PDT