The sv-ac has created mantis item 1769 which addresses the problem mentioned in mantis item 1620. 1620 is currently assigned to the sv-bc. I suggest that the sv-bc review the proposal for 1769. The proposal for 1769 has not yet been fully reviewed by the sv-ac. Neil -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [sv-ac] mantis item 1769 & 1620 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:54:40 -0700 From: Eduard Cerny <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com> To: sv-ac@eda.org I have added duplicate ID to 1620 and a bug note. ed Well... I did search if something like that exists, but did not find this one... #1769 has a proposal, 1620 does not. What should we do with them? ed > -----Original Message----- > From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:26 AM > To: Eduard Cerny; sv-ac@eda-stds.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ac] New mantis item #1769 - elaboration-time > assert and error message tasks > > See Mantis 1620. > > Shalom > > > I have created a new mantis item and deposited a proposal for > > elaboration-time assertions and error tasks. Attached here too. > -- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Mar 29 14:22:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 29 2007 - 14:23:02 PDT