RE: [sv-bc] Ballot for proposed changes for 1800-2008 Draft 3

1. > BP1-7-4   yes ___ no _x_ abstain ___
   > MH-1      yes _x_ no ___ abstain ___

I vote NO on BP1-7-4, preferring MH-1 instead. These 2 are different
proposals regarding the same paragraph, and are mutually exclusive.


2. > BP1-12-1  yes _x_ no ___ abstain ___

I vote YES in BP1-12-1, with the friendly amendment that it is on 12.3,
not 12.2.


3. > BP1-13-1  yes _x_ no ___ abstain ___

The proposal is, 'In 13.1, remove the sentence
"A function shall have at least one input type argument"
and remove the editorial question in the margin.'

I vote YES, with the friendly amendment to make the same changes in
13.3.


4. > BP1-13-3  yes ___ no _x_ abstain ___

I vote NO on BP1-13-3 because the proposal does not cover the case that
a return type is omitted completely, in which case it defaults to a
logic scalar. I would vote YES if the proposal were amended to cover
that case.


5. Regarding SB-O-*, I did not intend for these to be part of the vote,
either because there is no specific proposal or because it is a lot of
work and/or complex.


6. Regarding SB-O-7 (data types vs. net and variable types), for the
following draft, I propose to separate Clause 6 (Data Types) into two
clauses, one of which will be Data Types, and the other will be Data
Objects.


7. I vote YES on all other issues.

Shalom

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.