Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 03:05:03 PDT
Hi, I was just glancing through the new LRM Draft 3. There is some inconsistency in the names of some of the code examples, and though it is not really important, this is an opportunity to fix some of them. I wouldn't ask you to go through the LRM and search for such things, but if I bring attention to specific cases, I'd like to fix them. Specifically, I was looking at 10.4.2 (Nonblocking procedural assignments). Example 1 has a module name "evaluates2". Let's change it to simply "evaluates". Example 2 is named "non_block1". Since we spell nonblocking with nothing between 'non' and 'blocking', let's change the name to "nonblock1". Example is also named "non_block1". To differentiate, let's call it "nonblock2" (both in comment and in module name). Thanks, Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6852 +972 54 721-1033 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
