Thanks. That still has to be updated to Draft 3. Also, that Mantis does not deal with the 'variation' issue. Regards, Shalom ________________________________ From: Lisa Piper [mailto:piper@cadence.com] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 4:35 PM To: Bresticker, Shalom; john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 22.10 bind review This was fixed in SV-AC Mantis 1722 which has not yet been incorporated in draft 3. Lisa ________________________________ From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 6:40 AM To: Lisa Piper; john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ac] 22.10 bind review Also see thread beginning http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/5983.html . Shalom ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Piper Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 1:29 AM To: john.havlicek@freescale.com Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ac] 22.10 bind review Hi John, I confirmed that the 22.10 Text on Bind was copied from Draft1 to Draft3 correctly. However, I also happened to notice that the Clause 16 description in section 1.6 (page 26) needs to be updated to exclude assertion binding. It should probably be added to the Clause 22 description as well. Another think that stands out now is that the title "Binding properties to scopes or instances" is not generic enough. Bind was moved because it does not have to only be used for assertions. Also, I noticed that Syntax 22-3 - Module item syntax replicates the bind directive from Annex A. Mantis 1722 added a note to the annex A bind syntax but did not note that this reference also needs to be udpated. The other changes of 1722 are not yet incorporated either. Perhaps we should open another Mantis item to change the title and not the note for Syntx 22-3. Lisa -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Jun 1 22:29:18 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 22:30:43 PDT