Looks to me that when Brad edited the proposal for 1388, he took the one for 1215, edited the first part, and forgot the rest. What is there is simply left over from 1215, not intended to be part of 1388. Shalom > SVDB 1388 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1388 > > Friendly amendment : "The proposal > http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=1352&type=bug > contains 3 suggested changes to the text. The bottom 2 changes are > addressed separately as part of SVDB 1215 > I suggest this item be amended to only cover the proposed change to > Sec 16.2.4 and defer to SVDB 1215 on the proposed changes to 19.2 and > 19.11.3" > > I vote yes with or without my amendment, since 1215 has already been > voted on and approved. > > As a side note : I also checked 1800-2008/D3 Sec 33.2.4 also has the > updated language, so Stu's cut and paste worked :-) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 5 01:26:44 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 05 2007 - 01:26:56 PDT