RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot due 8am PDT, Monday, June 11, 2007

I accept all except:

1143 ABSTAIN
1589 NO
1641 ABSTAIN
1825 NO

Also, I added comments to:

1004
1064
1400

> SVDB  965 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=965
> 
> SVDB 1004 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1004

[SB] The proposal is better than the current text, but I would accept
Steven Sharp's proposal.

> SVDB 1064 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1064

[SB] I am surprised at Stu's comment that the simulator he tried works
differently. I tried the tools of the three major simulator vendors and
all did as described in the proposal.

> SVDB 1101 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1101
> 
> SVDB 1111 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1111
> 
> SVDB 1143 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1143

[SB] ABSTAIN: I had withdrawn the proposal.

> SVDB 1257 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1257
> 
> SVDB 1388 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1388
> 
> SVDB 1400 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1400

[SB] LRM should not specify tool defaults.

> SVDB 1497 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1497
> 
> SVDB 1499 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1499
> 
> SVDB 1505 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1505
> 
> SVDB 1562 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1562
> 
> SVDB 1589 ___Yes   _x_No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1589

[SB] I accept Steven's proposal. In addition, the syntax should not have
a semicolon at the end.
 
> SVDB 1597 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1597
> 
> SVDB 1606 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1606
> 
> SVDB 1620 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1620
> 
> SVDB 1641 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1641

[SB] ABSTAIN: I did not have to study the proposal.

> SVDB 1644 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1644
> 
> SVDB 1660 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1660
> 
> SVDB 1666 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1666
> 
> SVDB 1746 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1746
> 
> SVDB 1748 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1748
> 
> SVDB 1749 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1749
> 
> SVDB 1762 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1762
> 
> SVDB 1783 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1783
> 
> SVDB 1788 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1788
> 
> SVDB 1807 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1807
> 
> SVDB 1821 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1821
> 
> SVDB 1825 ___Yes   _x_No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1825

[SB] I accept Alex's comment that it is not a duplicate of 1807.

> SVDB 1831 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1831
> 
> SVDB 1850 _x_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1850

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.