hi SV-BC, I would value your collective advice on how best to approach this... For some time I've been troubled by the way interfaces and modports don't quite hit the spot for designers. I need solutions to two big problems: abstraction of interconnect, and configurable (generatable) port lists for design IP. Interfaces and modports get me close to both, but not close enough. I now have what I believe to be a coherent set of proposals for significant enhancement of the modport construct, and I'm ready to post a "white paper" as a Mantis item. I'm very conscious that sv-bc has a lot on its plate right now and I have no desire to disrupt that activity by adding a major new piece of work. There would be some knock-on work for CC and EC too, but the bulk of it would fall to BC. On the other hand, if I hold back for much longer, the changes would likely not make it into 1800-2008 - and thus something I feel *very* strongly about would probably not become available to designers within my working career. Is there any appetite within sv-bc for such work? Should I: - just go ahead and post a Mantis, and let it take its chances? - open an email discussion first, to refine the ideas so that a fully-formed proposal can be prepared? - accept that it's too much to do for 1800-2008, and simply hold off (frustrated) until later? Thanks for your consideration -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 12 02:47:32 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 12 2007 - 02:48:06 PDT