Date: Wed Jun 13 2007 - 04:49:21 PDT
Sorry. Except for the part that 10.7 should be 10.8, please ignore the rest. I think my eyes are too tired. "Never mind". Shalom ________________________________ From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 2:13 PM To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com Cc: sv-bc@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] statement labels Hi, In Draft 3, 9.3.5 has the annotation, "subclause from 1800-2005 10.7". I think that should be 10.8. More important, I don't see in 9.3.5 or elsewhere in Draft 3, the following text from 1800-2005 10.8: "SystemVerilog allows a label to be specified before any statement, as in C. A statement label is used to identify a single statement. The label name is specified before the statement, followed by a colon. labelA: statement A begin...end, fork...join, fork...join_any, or fork...join_none block is considered a statement and can have a statement label before the block. labelB: fork // label before the begin or fork ... join : labelB It shall be illegal to have both a label before a begin or fork and a block name after the begin or fork. A label cannot appear before the end, join, join_any, or join_none, as these keywords do not form a statement." Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6852 +972 54 721-1033 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
