Ah, but the user does not choose to use vpiTri. That is the value that the VPI returns to him on a net declaration. And if the user assumes automatically that it is a three-stated net (tri-state being a registered trademark of National Semiconductor), then he is making a mistake, because that assumption may not be correct. (Your offer isn't a fair one. On the other hand, if you want to trade off wire procedural assignments for defparams, I might consider it...) Shalom > Again, you are technically correct. The comment is technically not > accurate except that VPI users who use vpiTri are probably using it > as a tri-state driver. To me it is not a huge issue. > > That having been said, if you support allowing procedural assignments > to wires in Verilog, I will vote with you on this one :-) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Jul 4 23:38:07 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 04 2007 - 23:38:40 PDT