>Doesn't matter because package names and module names are in different namespaces. In http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=1214 , I asked Why aren't package identifiers part of the definitions name space? For example, can one really have a package 'NAME' with a function 'FOO' and simultaneously a class 'NAME' with a static class method 'FOO', and call both functions using the :: operator? How is the ambiguity to be resolved? NAME::FOO(); -- Brad [In reply to http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/6372.html .] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Jul 25 09:42:28 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 25 2007 - 09:42:36 PDT