RE: [sv-bc] "Nominal" vs "by name" as the opposite of "positional"

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Thu Aug 02 2007 - 18:13:53 PDT
>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>

>I don't mind a different name,  but I think 'nominal' would be cryptic.
>I think some documentations use a term like 'named association'.

Agreed.  "Named association" or "named connection" would be better.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Aug 2 18:14:11 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 02 2007 - 18:14:37 PDT