SV-BC, Below are my votes. It looked like a lot of issues at first, but it didn't actually take very long to go through them all. However, it obviously *did* take a lot of time for Shalom and Dave to create these many proposals. Thanks to both of you! -- Brad SVDB 910 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=910 SVDB 995 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=995 SVDB 1025 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1025 SVDB 1031 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1031 SVDB 1061 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1061 SVDB 1118 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1118 I voted yes, but isn't 1118 an editorial issue? SVDB 1140 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1140 SVDB 1141 ___Yes _XX__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1141 Don't understand what is meant by "This proposal is incorporated into the 1140 proposal." I would vote to close 1141 as already addressed by 1140. SVDB 1155 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1155 SVDB 1203 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1203 SVDB 1217 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1217 SVDB 1285 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1285 SVDB 1485 ___Yes _XX__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1485 Annex E is informative, not normative. SVDB 1651 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1651 SVDB 1665 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1665 SVDB 1693 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1693 SVDB 1938 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1938 SVDB 1939 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1939 SVDB 1940 ___Yes _XX__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1940 "A data object declaration" cannot be a scalar. Also, "multibit data-object" has a superfluous hyphen. SVDB 1941 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1941 SVDB 1955 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1955 SVDB 1958 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1958 SVDB 1963 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1963 This reminds me that 1) Examples with i=i+1, could be modernized by editor to i++. 2) Better, they could use the 'generate foreach' suggested in Mantis 897 SVDB 1988 ___Yes _XX__No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1988 I don't understand "Functions that return a value shall be assigned". (I know 'assigned' was already there, but I don't want to vote 'yes' for a phrase that doesn't make sense to me.) SVDB 1989 _XX__Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1989 -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:26 AM To: sv-bc@eda.org Subject: [sv-bc] E-mail Ballot: Respond by Wed Sep 05 8am PDT -You have until 8am PDT, Wednesday, September 05, 2007 to respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason. The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call. -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). As of the August 20, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are: Brad Pierce Shalom Bresticker Cliff Cummings Surrendra Dudani Mark Hartoog Francoise Martinolle Karen Pieper Dave Rich Steven Sharp Gordon Vreugdenhil Stu Sutherland Alex Gran Don Mills Heath Chambers Will Cummings SVDB 910 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=910 SVDB 995 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=995 SVDB 1025 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1025 SVDB 1031 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1031 SVDB 1061 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1061 SVDB 1118 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1118 SVDB 1140 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1140 SVDB 1141 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1141 SVDB 1155 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1155 SVDB 1203 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1203 SVDB 1217 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1217 SVDB 1285 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1285 SVDB 1485 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1485 SVDB 1651 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1651 SVDB 1665 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1665 SVDB 1693 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1693 SVDB 1938 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1938 SVDB 1939 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1939 SVDB 1940 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1940 SVDB 1941 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1941 SVDB 1955 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1955 SVDB 1958 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1958 SVDB 1963 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1963 SVDB 1988 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1988 SVDB 1989 ___Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1989 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Aug 24 17:22:31 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:22:57 PDT