Shalom, I'm just applying a phrase to always_latch that has been in the LRM since 3.1a regarding always_comb and always_ff http://www.eda-stds.org/sv/Changes_draft3/LRM_Changes_9.html <http://www.eda-stds.org/sv/Changes_draft3/LRM_Changes_9.html> See also http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/1859.html <http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/1859.html> -- Brad ________________________________ From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 4:49 AM To: Brad Pierce Cc: sv-bc@eda-stds.org Subject: Mantis 1468: always_latch has same restrictions as always_comb (11.3) Brad, In the proposal for Mantis 1468, in the sentence, "Variables on the left-hand side of assignments within an always_latch procedure, including variables from the contents of a called function, shall not be written to by any other processes", I think the following phrase is unclear: "variables from the contents of a called function". Regards, Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6852 +972 54 721-1033 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Sep 9 08:53:57 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 09 2007 - 08:54:09 PDT