Steven, > The 'inside' operator would be more useful for reals if you > could use the range comparisons instead of just the equality compares. Do you mean to imply you cannot? The LRM only says, "A range can be specified with a low and high bound enclosed by square braces [ ] and separated by a colon ( : ), as in [low_bound:high_bound]. A bound specified by $ shall represent the lowest or highest value for the type of the expression on the left-hand side. A match is found if the expression on the left-hand side is inclusively within the range. When specifying a range, the expressions must be of a singular type for which the relation operators ( <=, >= ) are defined. If the bound to the left of the colon is greater than the bound to the right, the range is empty and contains no values." Anyway, since so far I have only heard positive responses as to whether one should be able to use 'inside' on real operands, I am going to make that change in my proposal for 1035. Thanks, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 10 06:59:14 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 10 2007 - 06:59:26 PDT