Matt, Yes on everything but 1473. See comments below. Thanks, -Tom -----Original Message----- From: Maidment, Matthew R Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:49 PM To: Bresticker, Shalom; 'Brad Pierce'; 'Cummings, Cliff'; 'Surrendra Dudani'; 'Mark Hartoog'; 'Francoise Martinolle'; 'Karen Pieper'; 'Rich, Dave'; 'Steven Sharp'; 'Vreugdenhil, Gordon'; 'stuart@sutherland-hdl.com'; 'Gran, Alex'; 'Don Mills'; 'Heath Chambers'; Alsop, Thomas R; 'Warmke, Doug'; 'Logie Ramachandran'; Will Cummings Cc: 'sv-bc@eda-stds.org' Subject: E-mail Ballot: Respond by Sun Sep 16 8am PDT -You have until 8am PDT, Sunday, September 16, 2007 to respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason. The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call. -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in the bug note (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). As of the September 6, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are: Brad Pierce Shalom Bresticker Cliff Cummings Surrendra Dudani Mark Hartoog Francoise Martinolle Karen Pieper Dave Rich Steven Sharp Gordon Vreugdenhil Stu Sutherland Alex Gran Don Mills Heath Chambers Will Cummings Tom Alsop SVDB 933 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=933 SVDB 1175 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1175 SVDB 1302 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1302 SVDB 1354 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1354 SVDB 1417 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1417 SVDB 1438 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1438 SVDB 1468 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468 SVDB 1473 ___Yes _X_No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468 talsop - I don't see any difference in the new comments from the comment that the always_latch "executes identically" to the always_latch. In the always_comb clause is states "The variables written on the left-hand side of assignments shall not be written to by any other process." And yet we are adding this _and_ including the statement "from the contents of all called function". Isn't this true for always_comb too? From the emails threads this appears to be legacy comments. I think "executes identically" is good enough. SVDB 1554 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1554 SVDB 1767 _X_Yes ___No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1767 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 10 22:54:34 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 10 2007 - 22:54:44 PDT