[sv-bc] RE: E-mail Ballot: Respond by Sun Sep 16 8am PDT

> 
> SVDB  933 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=933
> 
> SVDB 1175 __[DR] X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1175
> 
> SVDB 1302 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1302
> 
> SVDB 1354 ___Yes   _[DR] X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1354
[DR] The endXXX: name is a general feature and this should go into a
more general section of the LRM, like 3.11 namespaces, or in 5.x as a
lexical convention.
> 
> SVDB 1417 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1417
[DR] propose to close as no change required
> 
> SVDB 1438 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1438
> 
> SVDB 1468 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468
> 
> SVDB 1473 ___Yes   __[DR] X_No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468
[DR] I'm voting no just to make sure this is thoroughly discussed. This
proposal makes a new keyword that starts with a number. Will that be a
problem?
> 
> SVDB 1554 __[DR] X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1554
> 
> SVDB 1767 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1767

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.