RE: [sv-bc] E-mal Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Sunday Sep 30, 2007

Regarding 1468 (always_latch), I propose the following wording: 

The always_latch procedure is identical to the always_comb procedure.
Therefore, all statements in 9.2.2.2 apply to always_latch as well. The
exception is with respect to design intent. always_latch is intended to
model latched logic, whereas always_comb is intended to model
combinational logic. Therefore software tools may perform additional
checks to warn if the behavior in an always_latch procedure does not
represent latched logic, whereas in an always_comb procedure, they may
check and warn if the behavior does not represent combinational logic.

Shalom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:53 PM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] E-mal Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Sunday Sep 30, 2007
> 
> 
> -You have until 8am PDT, Sunday, September 30, 2007 to 
> respond -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half 
> of the eligible  voters respond with a YES vote.
> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied 
> by a reason.
>  The issue will then be up for discussion during a future 
> conference call.
> -Note: For some issues, the proposed action is captured in 
> the bug note
>        (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.). 
> 
> As of the September 17, 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are:
> 
> Brad Pierce        
> Shalom Bresticker  
> Cliff Cummings     
> Surrendra Dudani   
> Mark Hartoog        
> Francoise Martinolle
> Karen Pieper       
> Dave Rich          
> Steven Sharp       
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Stu Sutherland
> Alex Gran
> Don Mills
> Heath Chambers
> Tom Alsop
> 
> SVDB  699 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=699
> 
> SVDB  907 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=907
> 
> SVDB 1035 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1035
> 
> SVDB 1228 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1228
> 
> SVDB 1425 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1425
> 
> SVDB 1468 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468
> 
> SVDB 1710 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1710
> 
> SVDB 1747 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1747
> 
> SVDB 1846 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1846
> 
> SVDB 1940 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1940
> 
> SVDB 1949 ___Yes   ___No  
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1949
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.