RE: [sv-bc] E-mal Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Sunday Sep 30, 2007

Thanks Dave.  The rewording makes this very clear now, so I change my
vote to yes on 907 with the friendly amendment.  -Tom

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Rich, Dave
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-bc] E-mal Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Sunday Sep 30, 2007

 

> >

> >SVDB  699 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=699

> >

> >SVDB  907 __[DR] X_Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=907

[DR] Since this already has a no vote, my suggested rewording is 

 

In the declaration of a parameter in a parameter_port_list, the

specification for its default value may be omitted, in which case the

parameter shall have no default value.  If no default value is specified

for a parameter of a design element, then an overriding parameter value

shall be specified in every instantiation of that design element (see

22.9).  Also, if no default value is specified for a parameter of a

design element, then the design element shall not be implicitly

instantiated (see 22.3, 22.4, and 23.3).  If no default value is

specified for a parameter of a class, then an overriding parameter value

shall be specified in every specialization of that class (see 8.24).

 

> >

> >SVDB 1035 ___Yes   __[DR] X_No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1035

[DR] Unlike a blocking assignment, a non-blocking assignment is not an

operator.

> >

> >SVDB 1228 __[DR] X_Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1228

> >

> >SVDB 1425 ___Yes   _[DR] X__No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1425

[DR] This level of wordsmithing is not justified

> >

> >SVDB 1468 ___Yes   _[DR] X__No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468

[DR] I was fine with the original wording.

> >

> >SVDB 1710 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1710

> >

> >SVDB 1747 ___Yes   __[DR] X_No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1747

[DR] You should not be allowed to do `default_nettype ports_only none

or it should only effect the ports.

> >

> >SVDB 1846 __[DR] X_Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1846

> >

> >SVDB 1940 __[DR] X_Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1940

> >

> >SVDB 1949 _[DR] X__Yes   ___No

> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1949

> >

> >--

> >This message has been scanned for viruses and

> >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

> >believed to be clean.

> >

> 

> --

> This message has been scanned for viruses and

> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

> believed to be clean.

> 

 

 

-- 

This message has been scanned for viruses and

dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.