RE: [sv-bc] release/deassign with variables driven by continuous assignments

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 22:09:46 PDT
OK. I had proposed an answer to that particular question, but someone
suggested that it was not so simple. I'll look for that correspondence
as well.
 
Shalom


________________________________

	From: Rich, Dave [mailto:Dave_Rich@mentor.com] 
	Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:07 AM
	To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-bc@server.eda.org
	Subject: RE: [sv-bc] release/deassign with variables driven by
continuous assignments
	
	

	OK, you file the parent, and I'll file this as a child.

	 

	
________________________________


	From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:03 PM
	To: Rich, Dave; sv-bc@server.eda.org
	Subject: RE: [sv-bc] release/deassign with variables driven by
continuous assignments

	 

	I made a list of the editor's questions and posted it on the
reflector, but not as a Mantis.

	 

	I can update the list to Draft 4 and open a new single parent
Mantis with all the questions.

	 

	That Mantis should be one of the items on SV-BC list to deal
with this revision of the standard. Of course, the decision regarding
some of the questions can be to postpone dealing with them.

	 

	Shalom

		 

		
________________________________


		From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
		Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 6:59 AM
		To: sv-bc@server.eda.org
		Subject: [sv-bc] release/deassign with variables driven
by continuous assignments

		In section 10.6.1 there is a question from the editor:
Does the result of a cont. assign to a variable update immediately when
the variable is released? 

		 

		The answer is in 6.5  "A release statement shall not
change the variable until there is another procedural assignment or
shall schedule a reevaluation of the continuous assignment driving it."
and probably should have been moved to 10.6

		 

		So the text in 10.6.1 and 10.6.2 is incorrect. It will
schedule an evaluation upon release, not wait for the next event that
causes an evaluation.

		 

		I thought someone, Shalom perhaps, already made up a
list of editor's questions as a mantis item, but I could not find it.

		 

		Dave

		 

		 

		
		-- 
		This message has been scanned for viruses and 
		dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is 
		believed to be clean. 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Intel Israel (74) Limited
	 
	This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
	the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
	by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
	recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Oct 10 22:10:48 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 22:10:59 PDT