> > SVDB 907 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=907 > > SVDB 1134 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1134 > > SVDB 1294 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1294 > > SVDB 1348 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1348 > > SVDB 1464 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1464 > > SVDB 1468 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468 > > SVDB 1588 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1588 > > SVDB 1619 ___Yes _[DR] X__No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1619 [DR] I do not like the difference in behavior with explicit port connection. If the user proved a default, then under no circumstances should it be left unconnected. > > SVDB 1792 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1792 > > SVDB 1940 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1940 > > SVDB 2024 _[DR] X__Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2024 > > SVDB 2056 __[DR] X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2056 > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Oct 13 20:44:52 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 13 2007 - 20:45:21 PDT