RE: [sv-bc] enum value uniqueness

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog_at_.....>
Date: Tue Oct 23 2007 - 09:11:54 PDT
I do not think this is legal. An enum is not a scope. The enum lablels
like 'IDLE" are created in the surrounding scope. The second enum
creates a duplicate symbol in the scope, which is illegal. 
 
You could put these in different packages, but not in the same scope.


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Bresticker, Shalom
	Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 7:25 AM
	To: sv-bc@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-bc] enum value uniqueness
	
	

	Hi, 

	Should the following be legal? 

	enum_logic [1:0] {IDLE ='0,START_XFER,WAIT_DONE} xfer_state; 
	enum_logic [1:0] {IDLE ='0,START_REQ ,WAIT_ACK } req_ack_state; 

	What about this? 

	enum_logic [1:0] {IDLE ='0,START_XFER,WAIT_DONE} xfer_state; 
	enum_logic [1:0] {IDLE      ,START_REQ, WAIT_ACK }
req_ack_state; 

	Thanks, 
	Shalom 


	Shalom Bresticker 
	Intel Jerusalem LAD DA 
	+972 2 589-6852 
	+972 54 721-1033 

	
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	Intel Israel (74) Limited
	
	This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for
	the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
distribution
	by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
	recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Oct 23 09:12:31 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 23 2007 - 09:12:46 PDT