>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com> >I'm all for deciding on this case, but currently the interactions are >undefined not only for this case, but for others as well, and users do >not have consistent behavior between tools. The proposal in any case >does not de-define an already defined case. As you point out here, it is easier to define something that is not yet defined than to re-define something that is already defined. So we should be careful that we don't define something until we are sure what we ultimately want to define. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Oct 26 16:55:41 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 16:55:49 PDT