RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Monday, October 29

> 
> SVDB  909 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=909
> 
> SVDB 1265 __X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1265
> 
> SVDB 1278 ___Yes   _X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1278

I was fine with construct. Process would be even better
> 
> SVDB 1360 ___Yes   _X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1360
The proposal needs to explicitly say that it is following the Longest
Static Prefix rules. Then it can cross-reference the section on LSP.
> 
> SVDB 1487 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1487
> 
> SVDB 1489 ___Yes   __X_No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1489
If you're trying to be more explicit, "program" should be "program with
no ports". If the other mantis issue passed that allows parameters with
no defaults, they are not implicitly instantiated as well.
> 
> SVDB 1573 ___Yes   __X_No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1573
This needs to be discussed. I believe this whole section needs to be put
into the rules for port connections of nets.
> 
> SVDB 1610 __X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1610
> 
> SVDB 1645 __X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1645
> 
> SVDB 1750 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1750
> 
> SVDB 1993 ___Yes   ___No X Abstain
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1993
> 
> SVDB 2006 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2006
> 
> SVDB 2029 __X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2029
> 
> SVDB 2081 ___Yes   _X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2081
Task enables are supposed to be legal. Also, an intra-assignment delay
IS as statement with an event control. An NBA may also have an event
control, that should be legal. Why not prohibit all fork statements.> 
> SVDB 2092 __X_Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2092
> 
> SVDB 2097 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2097
> 
> SVDB 2102 _X__Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102
> 
> SVDB 2140 ___Yes   _X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2140
Same as other peoples concerns.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.