Gord, > The proposed change to "shall" > is a big problem for sure. There is *no* change to "shall". The existing LRM says that in the case in question, coercion *may* occur. If not, then a warning *shall* be issued. The proposal does not touch that. So what are you talking about? Regards, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 29 08:53:37 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 29 2007 - 08:53:51 PDT